Comments on: Macbook Pro 9600M GT Gaming Performance Benchmarks http://installingcats.com/2008/10/18/macbook-pro-9600m-gt-gaming-performance-benchmarks/ Fixes for Apple AirPort, QuickTime AVI, and other Leopard Issues Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:46:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Perry http://installingcats.com/2008/10/18/macbook-pro-9600m-gt-gaming-performance-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-750 Perry Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:21:44 +0000 http://installingcats.com/?p=122#comment-750 Why show the HP results? All the MBP 9600m GT 3dmark06 scores I have seen are in the 5800-6200 range. Almost 50% faster than the 8600m GT. Why show the HP results? All the MBP 9600m GT 3dmark06 scores I have seen are in the 5800-6200 range.

Almost 50% faster than the 8600m GT.

]]> By: andy http://installingcats.com/2008/10/18/macbook-pro-9600m-gt-gaming-performance-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-643 andy Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:29:40 +0000 http://installingcats.com/?p=122#comment-643 In case you didn't know: the MachBook Pro contains the 9600M GT aswell as the 9400M. So the comparison (by apple) between those is just to show what you gain if you switch them (requires a logout). Btw the part of the comparison chart that you cut away desribes the testing conditions. In case you didn’t know: the MachBook Pro contains the 9600M GT aswell as the 9400M. So the comparison (by apple) between those is just to show what you gain if you switch them (requires a logout). Btw the part of the comparison chart that you cut away desribes the testing conditions.

]]>